Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Session 9 - Anchored Instruction

What are your initial reactions to this theory/model?
  • As I read the articles on anchored learning (AL), it sounded very similar to the problem-based learning and goal-based learning approaches. They all advise using real-world problem learning situations.  I find it really challenging to distinguish between PBL, GBL, and AL. It almost seems like researchers just tweaked the approach a little, and then they slap their name on a slightly different way of looking at things, and call it a new approach.
  • I feel that the majority of the students in a class would like to receive there real world problem scenario in a video format, since this is the most familiar method to them. The video would seem to connect the problem to more of the student’s senses, which could make it seem more real to the students.
What are barriers to its use?
  • I feel that creating interesting and effective AL modules can take a lot of time for the teachers to create. One big challenge I can see is the commitment needed to create different web modules. I know teachers that have been moved around by there administrations to teacher 4 different grade levels, in a five-year period. Why would a teacher want to make any web modules, when they are not certain what grade level they are teaching each year? I can see this being a real deterrent to creating web module.
  • Since our students come from a very diverse background, teachers would need to create many different AL scenarios, so that students can choose what would be of interest to them.
  • I have heard from many people that you get more out of reading the book, than just watching the movie made on a book. I wonder if the concept also applies to the current standardized curriculum, we currently teach in school.   Students get exposed to many different terms in a standardized curriculum movie, but do they really get the whole picture by not working with real world detailed situations that are like the story in a book?
  • I noticed that AL research seems to focus mostly on science and math learning situations. I wonder how well AL works on reading and writing language arts skills, which are taught heavily in elementary school.
Since we are taking learning theories/models that were not necessarily created with the Web in mind and turning them into Web modules, what Web-based tools or resources could be leveraged to carry out this learning theory/model online?
  • I believe AL can be implemented in a web-based environment. The challenge is coming up with interesting real-world situations for students to work with. I wonder how much time teachers can or are willing to spend helping their students understand the real world problem solving steps in the different approaches. When teachers have AYP goals and EOGs breathing down their necks, how do they assess if their students learned/gained all the EOG tested content knowledge, from the different real world learning approaches. I like the AL approach and I can see using it in my elementary classroom on a limited basis. With all the standardized testing taking place these days, I feel teachers may be reluctant to spend many months trying to teach their students how to critically think, and possibly miss their AYP and EOG goals, and then be out on the street, trying to find another job.

7 comments:

  1. I agree, using a video to display the problem would make it more real to the students, and I think students would be more motivated and engaged. I could also definitely see how this model could take a long time to develop. Teachers would have to create scenarios for various levels of students in their classroom.

    I think some students would benefit from watching the videos of the problems. I think it somewhat depends on the different learning styles of the students; some may enjoy reading while others enjoy visually seeing something being done. Teachers could provide both options to students in the classroom so they can choose which best suits them.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think the use of multi-media would be the best way to integrate the use of this model. I know, here we are right back at planning and time for teachers being a potential barrier. You discussed a valid and "real" problem, the looming cloud of the "EOG World." I heard that within the next couple of years, the EOG's are going to be focused on more open-ended questions as opposed to the traditional multiple choice. It appears that with the implementation of the new Core Curriculum standards, our teaching will be centered around these models...perhaps being exposed to this information in this class will give us somewhat of an "edge" with the adoption of the new curriculum.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think your point about video/movie vs. book is interesting - as well as the potential for applying anchored learning in non-math/sci settings.

    Your points made me think about how sometimes reading fiction/non-fictional stories can help me think through life problems I might be facing at successive life stages. I wonder if some of the principles of anchored instruction could be applied to help teach younger students develop similar (and better) problem solving strategies?

    ReplyDelete
  4. You raise a good point about the time and effort that must go into creating the scenario. The examples shown in the Jasper Woodbury problems would be no small task to create. If it is not something that can be reused multiple times, I would say it would be a wasted effort. I agree that this can be a deterrent for utilizing this approach.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mike,
    I agree that all of these methods are starting to sound alike.

    ReplyDelete
  6. You hit a nerve there, Mike, when you said that people get more out of reading a book than watching a movie about the book. I agree enthusiastically, not just because agreement is in vogue in this class, but because I'm a big believer in reading. My gut instinct is that videos are a way of accomodating a world that is so visually oriented that books are considered old-fashioned. Yet I think that reading requires us to form images of what is being read. Einstein once said that imagination is more important than knowledge. That is quite a profound statement. Could it be that we might use videos for the sole purpose of accommodating people who are too lazy or too impatient to read a book? Just a thought....

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mike and Al,
    I totally agree. I would rather read the book than watch the video. It seems like the book provides more details so you have a better idea of what is happening.

    ReplyDelete